JIPOAd
ESID
TCR
  • Users Online: 133
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 
Table of Contents
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 16-22

Bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) domain protein inhibitors for solid tumor cancers


Sarah Cannon Research Institute at HealthONE, Denver, CO, USA

Date of Submission23-Oct-2019
Date of Acceptance11-Dec-2019
Date of Web Publication05-Feb-2020

Correspondence Address:
Martin V Nguyen
Sarah Cannon Research Institute at HealthONE, Denver, CO
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/JIPO.JIPO_2_20

Get Permissions

  Abstract 


The bromodomain and extraterminal (BET) domain protein family is involved in the process of transcription of genetic information. The BET protein family includes BRD2, BRD3, BRD4, and bromodomain testis-specific protein. BET protein alterations are associated with some solid tumor cancers, including nuclear protein in testis midline carcinoma. BET protein has a role in carcinogenesis and in the regulation of the cell cycle. A number of BET inhibitors have entered clinical trials. This review discusses the results of BET inhibitor clinical trials in solid tumor cancers.

Keywords: Bromodomain and extraterminal domain, bromodomain and extraterminal inhibitor, cancer, clinical trial, review


How to cite this article:
Nguyen MV, Loof L, Falchook GS. Bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) domain protein inhibitors for solid tumor cancers. J Immunother Precis Oncol 2020;3:16-22

How to cite this URL:
Nguyen MV, Loof L, Falchook GS. Bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) domain protein inhibitors for solid tumor cancers. J Immunother Precis Oncol [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Apr 1];3:16-22. Available from: http://www.jipoonline.org/text.asp?2020/3/1/16/277825




  Introduction Top


The bromodomain and extraterminal (BET) domain protein family is involved in the process of transcription of genetic information.[1] The BET protein family includes BRD2, BRD3, BRD4, and bromodomain testis-specific protein.[1],[2],[3] Acetylation of histones via histone acetyltransferases removes the partial positive charge from the histone, leading to decreased interaction between the partial negative charge of the phosphate groups in DNA.[3] This event causes the DNA to transit from heterochromatin (highly condensed, transcriptionally inactive) to euchromatin (relaxed, transcriptionally active). BRD4 selectively binds to acetylated lysine residues on histones and serves as epigenetic readers, which recruits other subunits and proteins for DNA transcription. BRD4 functions as a mitotic bookmark for genes to be transcribed in early G1 phase.[4],[5] BRD2 is suspected to interact with transcription factors which involve RNA polymerase II, resulting in the formation of a protein complex which initiates transcription.[5] BET proteins are also involved in kinase activity, but the specific function has not yet been identified.[3]

Because normal BET protein function involves transcription and cell proliferation, aberration of these proteins contributes to genetic mutations and uncontrolled cell proliferation. In nuclear protein in testis (NUT) midline carcinoma (NMC), BRD4 forms a fusion oncoprotein as a result of a translocation which drives the development of the disease.[4] BET proteins also play a role in carcinogenesis because of their role in the regulation of the cell cycle. BRD4 protein is related to c-MYC transcription.[1],[2] C-MYC is a proto-oncogene that is involved in the proliferation and growth mechanisms of the cell. C-MYC translocation occurs in various hematologic malignancies, which can drive carcinogenesis.[1],[3],[4],[5] In solid tumor cancers, c-MYC overexpression and amplification have been observed and are also implicated in carcinogenesis.[3]

BET inhibitors competitively bind to the same site similar to the acetyl lysine histones. This downregulates transcription expression and causes G1 arrest in the cell. However, BET inhibitors selectively bind to superenhancers within cancer cells and do not affect the surrounding wild-type cells.[5] BET inhibitors have been tested with in-vitro and in-vivo models and have shown that inhibition of BET proteins downregulates MYC expression.[5] When treated with a BET inhibitor JQ1, mice with MYC-amplified tumors showed more intense effects of cell apoptosis and inhibited cell differentiation.[3],[4] However, in another preclinical testing of BET inhibitors, there was no correlation between MYC mRNA levels and drug exposure.[3],[5] The relationship between MYC downregulation and BET inhibition is still under investigation.

Preclinical studies of first-generation synthetic BET inhibitors, such as JQ1 (thienotriazolodiazepine), have shown anticancer activity in murine and xenograft models of NMC, acute myeloid leukemia (AML), multiple myeloma, and Burkitt's lymphoma.[3] Specifically in NMC, suppression of the BRD4–NUT fusion gene that is known to drive NMC growth has resulted in the growth arrest of NMC cells. In AML, preclinical studies have found that BET inhibitors may be able to successfully block the expression of c-MYC.[6] Significant antiproliferative results were also presented in a study, in which five T-cell lymphoma cell lines were incubated with JQ1, which also resulted in decreased c-MYC levels in all cell lines except one.[7] While various studies have demonstrated the preclinical efficacy of BET inhibition as monotherapy, combination regimens may also be promising. BET inhibitors have demonstrated synergy with immune checkpoint inhibitors and epigenetic agents, specifically histone deacetylase inhibitors.[5]

Toxicities observed in the preclinical setting include depletion of hematopoietic cells, skin hyperplasia, and disruption of the intestinal crypts in mice with reduced BRD4 levels; neuronal defects and obesity in mice with reduced BRD2 levels; and impaired long-term memory and heightened anxiety in mice receiving JQ1.[3]

Early-stage clinical trials of BET inhibitors that target hematologic malignancies have demonstrated promising preliminary results. A Phase I, dose-finding trial of birabresib (previously MK-8628/OTX-015) (Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp., Kenilworth, NJ, USA) that started in December 2012 and ended in January 2017 observed antitumor responses in patients with leukemia and lymphoma. Among the 41 patients enrolled in the acute leukemia cohort of the study, three patients had a complete response (CR) (all the three with AML) and two had a partial response (PR) (one with AML and one with myelodysplastic syndrome). Among the 45 patients enrolled in the nonleukemic cohort of the study, two had a CR (both with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [DLBCL]), one had a PR (with DLBCL), and six had stable disease (SD) (four with DLBCL and two with indolent lymphoma). While no patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events (AEs), the most common AEs in the acute leukemia cohort were gastrointestinal (vomiting, nausea, and diarrhea), fatigue, and hyperbilirubinemia. Similar AEs were observed in the nonleukemic cohort, but cytopenias were more prevalent (58% experienced Grade [G] 3 thrombocytopenia). Preliminary results from both trials concluded that birabresib can be safely administered in patients with advanced hematologic malignancies.[3],[8],[9],[10]

Antitumor activity in hematologic malignancies has also been observed in a Phase I trial of CPI-0610 (Constellation Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, USA) in patients with lymphoma that started in September 2013 and ended in December 2017. Of the 64 patients enrolled in the study, two had a CR (both with DLBCL), three had a PR (two with DLBCL and one with follicular lymphoma [FL]), and five (all with DLBCL) had SD of > 6 months. Thrombocytopenia was the most common AE (45%), but it was reversible and not cumulative.[11],[12]

A Phase I trial of GSK525762 (GlaxoSmithKline, Brentford, UK) on 46 participants with AML also showed antitumor activity. Three patients had PRs and two had CRs (one with incomplete count recovery and one with incomplete platelet recovery). The most common AEs were dysgeusia (37%), diarrhea (33%), and nausea (28%). Preliminary results concluded that GSK525762 is safe and effective in patients with AML.[13],[14]

An open-label safety and tolerability study of INCB057643 (Incyte Corporation, Wilmington, DE, USA) that started in May 2016 and ended in January 2019 showed antitumor activity in patients with FL. Of the 16 participants enrolled in the trial, three had FL, of which one participant had a CR and two had prolonged SD The only dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was increased international normalized ratio (INR) in one patient, and the trial concluded that INCB057643 is safe and effective in patients with FL.[15],[16]

This review discusses the BET pathway, the biological rationale for BET inhibitors, and the clinical trials involving BET inhibitors in solid tumor cancers.


  Bromodomain and Extraterminal Inhibitor Clinical Trials in Solid Tumor Cancers Top


BAY1238097

BAY1238097 (Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany) is a selective BET inhibitor that suppresses the expression of MYC and BRD4 proteins and is administered orally.[17] A Phase I dose-escalation study was started in March 2015 but was terminated in 2016 due to toxicity, with DLTs occurring at doses lower than the aimed drug exposure. This trial enrolled eight patients, who were administered oral tablet twice weekly at dose levels of 10 mg/week (n = 3), 40 mg/week (n = 3), and 80 mg/week (n = 2). DLTs were observed in both patients treated at 80 mg, including G3 vomiting, G3 headache, and G2/3 back pain. The most common AEs were nausea, vomiting, headache, back pain, and fatigue. Biomarker analysis indicated a decrease of MYC expression and a linear relationship between dose response and increasing dose. Prolonged disease stability was observed in two patients, but no objective response was achieved in any patient.


  Birabresib (Previously Mk-8628/otx015) Top


Birabresib (previously MK-8628/OTX015) (Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp., Kenilworth, NJ, USA) is an orally administered BET inhibitor.[18],[19] An open-label, Phase Ib, 3 + 3 dose-escalation trial of birabresib to determine DLT and recommended Phase II dose began in October 2014 and enrolled 47 patients (one was not treated) with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), NMC, and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In cohort A, birabresib was administered once daily in a fasted state in a 21-day cycle. The starting dose level tested was 80 mg, and the highest dose level tested was 100 mg. In cohort B, birabresib was administered once daily in a fasted state for the first 7 days of a 21-day cycle. The starting dose level was 100 mg and the highest dose level was 160 mg. In cohort A, 24 patients were treated including 19 patients at 80 mg, of which 4 (21.1%) experienced DLTs of G3 thrombocytopenia (n = 3) and alanine aminotransferase elevation/hyperbilirubinemia (n = 1). Three patients were treated at 100 mg, of which two (66.7%) experienced DLTs of G2 anorexia and nausea (n = 1 for each) and G4 thrombocytopenia (n = 1). In cohort B, 22 participants were treated, and no DLTs were observed. Among the total 46 participants, 38 experienced AEs, including diarrhea (37%), nausea (37%), anorexia (30.4%), vomiting (26.1%), and thrombocytopenia (21.7%). PR was reported in three patients receiving 80 mg daily (15.8%), all with NMC. The study was completed in March 2017.

A Phase IIa, dose-optimization trial of birabresib began in October 2014 to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM).[20],[21] Of the 12 participants, 6 received 80 mg, four received 120 mg, and two received 160 mg in a fasted state once daily throughout a 28-day cycle. All the participants experienced at least one AE. Three participants experienced DLTs including one participant receiving 80 mg daily (G3 thrombocytopenia) and two participants receiving 160 mg daily (G3 thrombocytopenia and G3 hyperbilirubinemia). Other AEs included G1 and G2 diarrhea (33.3%), G2 myalgia (8.3%), and G1 INR increase (8.3%). The best response in all patients was progressive disease. The study concluded that birabresib is safe and well tolerated in patients with GBM, and MTD was declared 120 mg. However, the study was terminated in October 2015 due to limited efficacy.

An open-label, Phase 1b, dose-exploration study to determine the MTD of birabresib in patients with advanced NMC, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and CRPC began in May 2016.[22],[23],[24] Thirteen participants were enrolled in cohort A and were to receive 20, 30, or 40 mg of birabresib in a fasted state twice daily for 21 consecutive days per cycle. No patients received more than 20 mg of birabresib. Three participants (23.1%) experienced at least one DLT, including G4 thrombocytopenia, G3 fatigue, and G2 hematuria. Eleven participants (84.6%) experienced a drug-related AE and seven (53.9%) experienced G3 or higher drug-related AEs. The highest efficacy reported was SD in six patients (46.2%), all with CRPC. The study was terminated in April 2017 due to low efficacy and not because of safety reasons.

BMS986158

BMS986158 (Bristol-Myers Squibb, New York City, NY, USA) is a selective oral BET inhibitor. As of 2018, 69 patients have been enrolled in a dose-escalation trial of BMS986158.[25] BMS986158 was administered at doses of 0.75, 1.25, 2.0, 3.0, and 4.5 mg qd across the following three schedules: schedule A was 5 days on/2 days off (n = 31), schedule B was 14 days on/7 days off (n = 8), and schedule C was 7 days/14 days off (n = 29). Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis showed Tmax of 2–4 h, T1/2 of 33–82 h, and linear PK. DLT of thrombocytopenia was observed and was reversible. Nearly 63% of the patients experienced AEs, the most common of which were diarrhea (34%), thrombocytopenia (28%), and fatigue (16%). Among four patients with NMC, one patient treated at 2.0 mg on schedule A was treated for 279 days and experienced a 16% tumor reduction. Clinical correlates included gene transcription for biomarkers of BET activity (e.g., CCR2 and HEXIM1) in peripheral blood cells, which were dose dependent and reversible.

GSK525762

GSK525762 (GlaxoSmithKline, Brentford, UK) is administered as an oral tablet that selectively inhibits expression of the BET protein.[26] A Phase I, open-label, 3 + 3 dose-escalation trial began in 2012. Part I of the trial was completed in 2016 with seventy enrolled patients with NMC and other solid tumor cancers. The starting dose level was 2 mg daily and the highest dose level tested was 100 mg daily. In addition, twice-a-day (BID) schedule was tested, including 20 and 30 mg BID. Preliminary results from part 1 have been reported. PK was dose proportional up to 80 mg qd. DLTs were observed at doses of 60 mg (n = 1, 11%), 80 mg (n = 3, 14%), and 100 mg (n = 1, 11%) during the first 28 days of treatment. The most common AEs at all dose levels were thrombocytopenia (44%), nausea (40%), vomiting (29%), anemia (26%), fatigue (26%), decreased appetite (24%), diarrhea (23%), and dysgeusia (20%). Eleven patients with NMC treated on the once-daily schedule were evaluated for response. Two patients exhibited PR, four patients exhibited SD, and one patient had not yet been evaluated. The recommended dose to use in a Phase II was 80 mg daily. The Phase II expansion is ongoing and will enroll up to 150 participants. No preliminary results have yet been presented.

A separate ongoing Phase Ib trial is studying the effect of GSK525762 with either abiraterone (antiandrogen) (Janssen Pharmaceutica, Beerse, Belgium) or enzalutamide (antiandrogen) (Astellas Pharma, Tokyo, Japan).[27] The study has been active as of 2017 but is no longer recruiting. Thirty-seven patients with CRPC have been enrolled. No preliminary trial results have yet been presented.

INCB054329

INCB054329 (Incyte Corporation, Wilmington, Delaware, USA) is a potent BET protein inhibitor that is administered orally.[15] As of 2018, the ongoing clinical trial had enrolled 54 patients with solid tumors (n = 50) or lymphoma (n = 4). INCB054329 was administered at doses of 15–30 mg qd to 15–25 mg bid, on various schedules of 5 days on/2 days off, 4 days on/3 days off, and 7 days on/7 days off. One patient (2%) with NSCLC achieved a PR with 61% decrease. Five patients (10%) had clinical progression, 3 patients (6%) had SD for > 6 months, and 14 patients (28%) had SD for < 6 months. The most common AEs included nausea (24%), fatigue (28%), thrombocytopenia (9%), and decreased appetite (24%). Two fatal nontreatment-related AEs were reported (respiratory failure, n = 1 and septic shock, n = 1). PK demonstrated a T1/2 of ~ 2–3 h, with a median exposure of 8.5 weeks. One DLT of thrombocytopenia was observed at 30 mg BID daily. Twenty milligram BID was the selected dose to be used in future trials.

INCB057643

INCB057643 (Incyte Corporation, Wilmington, DE) is an orally administered small-molecule BET inhibitor.[15],[16],[28] An open-label, four-part study to determine the safety and efficacy of INCB057643 in patients with advanced malignancies began in May 2016. Patients enrolled in part 1 of the trial received a starting dose of 8 mg, 12 mg, or 16 mg administered once daily during a 21-day cycle. Part 2 of the study further evaluated the safety, efficacy, PK, and pharmacodynamics (PD) of INCB057643. Patients in part 2 received 12-mg administered once daily during the 21-day cycle. Of the 16 patients enrolled in part 1, one experienced DLT at 16 mg (G3 increased INR), and 12 mg was determined to be the MTD and the recommended dose for part 2. The most common AEs in part 1 were decreased appetite in seven patients (43.8%), nausea in six patients (37.5%), and hyperglycemia in five patients (31.3%). Of the 13 patients enrolled in part 1 with solid tumors, 11 were evaluable for efficacy and one of those patients had SD > 6 months. The most common AE among the 16 patients enrolled in part 2 was nausea in four patients (25%). Of the 14 patients enrolled in part 2 with solid tumors, only two were evaluable for efficacy and both had disease progression. Parts 3 and 4 of the study were designed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, PK, and PD of INCB057643 in combination with standard-of-care agents (gemcitabine, paclitaxel, rucaparib, abiraterone, ruxolitinib, and azacitidine), but the study was terminated in January 2019 for safety reasons and no results have been published.

An open-label, Phase ½ trial with three treatment groups began in January 2017 to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of pembrolizumab and epacadostat combined with azacitidine (Group A), INCB057643 (Group B), and INCB059872 (Group C).[19],[29] Treatment Group B of the study consisted of two parts. In part one, which followed a 3 + 3 + 3 dose-escalation design, patients orally self-administered INCB057643 qd throughout the 21-day cycle. The patients also received pembrolizumab administered in 30-min intravenous (IV) infusions on the 1st day of each cycle beginning with cycle 2 and epacadostat administered orally twice daily beginning on cycle 2 on day 1. Part 2 of the treatment Group B was a further evaluation of the recommended doses established in part 1, specifically in patients with NSCLC and microsatellite-stable colorectal cancer. No results have been published.

RO6870810 (previously TEN-010)

RO6870810 (previously TEN-010) (Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland) is a small-molecule BET inhibitor.[30],[31] A Phase I, open-label, dose-escalation study was conducted in two parts to determine the safety, PK, tolerability, and efficacy in patients with advanced solid tumors. An estimated total of 84 participants were to be enrolled, including 54 in part A and 30 in part B. Patients enrolled in part A of this study received a starting dose of 0.03 mg/kg of RO6870810 administered by subcutaneous injection, which was escalated to a maximum dose of 0.85 mg/kg. Treatment in part A was administered daily for either 14 days of a 21-day cycle or for 21 days of a 28-day cycle. Part B of the study was designed to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of RO6870810, in which participants received the drug at a dose up to the MTD established in part A. The study began in October 2013 and ended in October 2017, but no results have yet been published.

A Phase Ib study began in November 2017 to evaluate the dose, safety, PK, and efficacy of RO6870810 in combination with atezolizumab at a fixed dose in patients with advanced ovarian cancer and/or TNBC.[17],[32] Patients in all the four groups of this study received 1200-mg atezolizumab IV on the 1st day of a 21-day cycle in addition to the dose of RO6870810 designed for each group. In part 1 (dose-escalation group), the participants received doses of RO6870810 administered by subcutaneous injection starting at 0.3 mg/kg (escalated to 0.45 mg/kg and/or 0.65 mg/kg) for the first 14 days of a 21-day cycle. Participants enrolled in part 2 of the study (sequential dose group) received RO6870810 as monotherapy (starting dose 0.3 mg/kg) for the first 14 days of the run-in period, and then received the same dose of RO6870810 qd combined with 1200-mg atezolizumab on the 1st day of every 21-day cycle. The safety, PK, PD, and clinical activity of RO6870810 in patients with TNBC and/or ovarian cancer will be further evaluated in parts 3 and 4 (expansion groups) of the study. No results have yet been published, and the trial has been temporarily suspended for an evaluation of safety and efficacy.


  Discussion Top


BET inhibitors have entered clinical trials for patients with both hematologic and solid tumor cancers because of promising results in preclinical studies. Seven such BET inhibitors have entered clinical trials for solid tumors. The most common solid tumor cancers treated in these clinical trials include NMC, NSCLC, and CRPC [Table 1].
Table 1: Bromodomain and extraterminal protein inhibitor trials

Click here to view


To date, GSK525762, INCB054329, birabresib, and BMS986158 have shown evidence of antitumor activity. Out of the 11 patients with NMC treated with GSK525762, two had a PR and four had SD, and one has not yet been evaluated. Among the four patients with NMC treated with BMS986158, one patient was observed with a 16% tumor decrease. The trial of INCB054329 treated patients with NSCLC, lymphoma, and other solid tumor cancers. One patient achieved a PR with 61% decrease and 17 patients with SD in a cohort of 54 patients (three patients with SD > 6 months and 14 patients with SD < 6 months). Forty-seven patients (one was not treated) with CRPC, NMC, and NSCLC were treated with birabresib. A PR was reported in three patients diagnosed with NMC. In the trial of INCB057643, one patient observed SD for > 6 months. Additional trials are still ongoing, with results not yet reported.

All BET inhibitors that have entered clinical trials to date have been administered as oral agents with the exception of RO6870810, which was a subcutaneous injection. PK properties have been observed to be variable among these agents. For example, the half-life of BMS986158 was observed to be 33–82 h, in contrast to INCB054329 which had a half-life of 2–3 h. Consequently, the dosing schedules of each of these agents have varied. For example, GSK525762 was administered daily, whereas BMS986158 had schedules that varied from 5 days on/2 days off, 14 days on/7 days off, or 7 days/14 days off. The differences in PK properties may be attributed to variable binding strength of each agent.

The most common or dose-limiting toxicities observed with BET inhibitors to date include thrombocytopenia, nausea, diarrhea, and fatigue. Grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia was observed in 9%–45% of patients who received BET inhibitors but was also reversible and not cumulative. Nausea was observed in 28%–40% of patients. Diarrhea was documented to affect 33%–37% of patients, and fatigue affected 17%–26% of patients who were administered a BET inhibitor. All AEs were reversible and were typically tolerable with supportive medication.

Given the relatively low response rate among patients treated with BET inhibitors to date, a selective biomarker may be a promising development strategy for this class of medication. One potential biomarker for selecting patients may be MYC amplification or other alterations in the MYC signaling pathway. A preclinical study of 673 cell lines incubated with the BET inhibitor JQ1 showed a strong correlation between MYC amplification and sensitivity to the drug, but of the 99 sensitive cell lines, only four had MYC amplification.[5] The importance of MYC amplification is illustrated by a trend of decreasing MYC expression among responding patients who received treatment with BET inhibitor BAY1238097.[19] However, despite this evidence suggesting a relationship between MYC expression and response to BET inhibition, there is currently no published data to confirm that patients with MYC amplification experience greater clinical benefit. Additional analyses are ongoing.

Data from preclinical studies suggest that BET inhibitors may be effective when administered in combination with epigenetic inhibitors, kinase inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, cell cycle inhibitors, DNA damage repair agents, and chemotherapy.[14] Some examples of preclinical studies of such combinations showing promising results include combinations with PI3K inhibitors in breast, ovarian, and colorectal cancers; extracellular signal-related kinase inhibitors in ovarian cancer; poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in ovarian and breast cancer; and HER2 inhibitors in breast cancer.[3] In preclinical lymphoma models, synergistic activity has been observed in combination with Bruton's tyrosine kinase, BI3K, and BCL2 inhibitors, and there are currently two clinical trials studying the effects of BET inhibitors combined with BCL2 inhibitors in patients with relapsed lymphoma.

Due to the high toxicity and limited long-term efficacy observed to date with BET inhibitors, in addition to the development of resistance mechanisms to this class of drugs, it has become increasingly important to explore other agents which target this pathway, which may be potentially more selective, more potent, and/or less toxic than what has already been investigated. One such medication, AZD5153 (AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK), is a BRD4 inhibitor that has shown antitumor activity in preclinical models, and began the first-in-human clinical trial in June 2017.[33] Of 28 patients enrolled, seven patients experienced Grade ≥ 3 AEs, which were thrombocytopenia and fatigue (7.1% each), anemia, diarrhea, and decreased platelets (3.6% each).[34] Preliminary results established AZD5153 to be tolerated in patients with relapsed/refractory solid tumors and lymphoma at doses up to 30 mg qd.[35] BRD4 may be a potentially promising target for more selective BET inhibition in future.

In summary, BET inhibitors are a promising class of drug, which have shown early antitumor activity in solid tumor cancers. Additional studies are ongoing to further investigate efficacy in specific tumor types.

Financial support and sponsorship

The authors disclosed no funding related to this article.

Conflicts of interest

Drs. Nguyuen and Loof have no disclosures. Dr. Falchook disclosed the following relationships and activities: Royalties: Wolters Kluwer (2014–present); advisory role: Fujifilm (2018, to institution) and EMD Serono (2010, 2011, to self); travel: Bristol-Myers Squibb, EMD Serono (2011, 2012, and 2013), Fujifilm (2018), Millennium (2013), and Sarah Cannon Research Institute; speakers bureau: Total Health Conferencing (2019); and research funding: 3-V Biosciences, Abbisko, Abbvie, ADC Therapeutics, Aileron, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Amgen, ARMO, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bioatla, Biothera, Celldex, Celgene, Ciclomed, Curegenix, Curis, Cyteir, Daiichi, DelMar, eFFECTOR, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Epizyme, Exelixis, Fujifilm, Genmab, GlaxoSmithKline, Hutchison MediPharma, Ignyta, Incyte, Jacobio, Jounce, Kolltan, Loxo, MedImmune, Millennium, Merck, miRNA Therapeutics, National Institutes of Health, Novartis, OncoMed, Oncothyreon, Precision Oncology, Prelude, Regeneron, Rgenix, Ribon, Strategia, Syndax, Taiho, Takeda, Tarveda, Tesaro, Tocagen, Turning Point Therapeutics, U. T. MD Anderson Cancer Center, Vegenics, and Xencor.



 
  References Top

1.
Garnier JM, Sharp PP, Burns CJ. BET bromodomain inhibitors: A patent review. Expert Opin Ther Pat 2014;24:185-99.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Fujisawa T, Filippakopoulos P. Functions of bromodomain-containing proteins and their roles in homeostasis and cancer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2017;18:246-62.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Stathis A, Bertoni F. BET proteins as targets for anticancer treatment. Cancer Discov 2018;8:24-36.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Zuber J, Shi J, Wang E, et al. RNAi screen identifies Brd4 as a therapeutic target in acute myeloid leukaemia. Nature 2011;478:524-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Doroshow DB, Eder JP, LoRusso PM. BET inhibitors: A novel epigenetic approach. Ann Oncol 2017;28:1776-87.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Bolden J, Tasdemir N, Dow L, et al. Abstract LB-40: Inducible in vivo silencing of Brd4 identifies potential toxicities of sustained BET protein inhibition. Tumor Biol 2014;8:1919-29.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Rizzitano S, Cavano A, Piazzoni M. Synergistic anti-tumor efficacy of BET inhibitors JQ1 and Otx-015 in combination with dasatinib in preclinical models of T-cell lymphomas. Am Soc Hematol 2016;128:3967.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Abedin SM, Boddy CS, Munshi HG. BET inhibitors in the treatment of hematologic malignancies: Current insights and future prospects. Onco Targets Ther 2016;9:5943-53.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
A Dose-Finding Study of the Bromodomain (Brd) Inhibitor OTX015/MK-8628 in Hematologic Malignancies (MK-8628-001) – Full Text View. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01713582. [Accessed Aug 17, 2019].  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Amorim S, Stathis A, Gleeson M, et al. Bromodomain inhibitor OTX015 in patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma: A dose-escalation, open-label, pharmacokinetic, Phase 1 study. Lancet Haematol 2016;3:e196-204.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Blum KA, Abramson J, Maris M, et al. 410 A Phase I study of CPI-0610, a bromodomain and extra terminal protein (BET) inhibitor in patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma. Ann Oncol 2018;29 Suppl 3:mdy048.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
A Phase 1 Study Evaluating CPI-0610 in Patients with Progressive Lymphoma – Full Text View. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01949883. [Accessed Aug 18, 2019].  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Dawson M, Stein E, Huntly B, et al. A Phase I study of GSK525762, a selective bromodomain (BRD) and extra terminal protein (BET) inhibitor: Results from part 1 of Phase I/II open label single agent study in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Blood 2017;130:1377.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Alqahtani A, Choucair K, Ashraf M, et al. Bromodomain and extra-terminal motif inhibitors: A review of preclinical and clinical advances in cancer therapy. Future Sci OA 2019;5:FSO372.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Falchook G, Talpaz M, Mita M, et al. Abstract A093: Phase 1/2 study of INCB054329, a bromodomain and extraterminal (BET) protein inhibitor, in patients (pts) with advanced malignancies. Mol Cancer Ther 2018;17 Suppl 1. [Doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.targ-17-a093].  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Open-Label Safety and Tolerability Study of INCB057643 in Subjects with Advanced Malignancies – Full Text View. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02711137. [Accessed Aug 18, 2019].  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Postel-Vinay S, Herbschleb K, Massard C, et al. First-in-human Phase I study of the bromodomain and extraterminal motif inhibitor BAY 1238097: Emerging pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship and early termination due to unexpected toxicity. Eur J Cancer 2019;109:103-10.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Lewin J, Soria JC, Stathis A, et al. Phase IB trial with birabresib, a small-molecule inhibitor of bromodomain and extraterminal proteins, in patients with selected advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 2018;36:3007-14.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
A Dose-Finding Study of MK-8628, a Small Molecule Inhibitor of the Bromodomain and Extra-Terminal (BET) Proteins, in Adults with Selected Advanced Solid Tumors (MK-8628-003) – Full Text View. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02259114. [Accessed Aug 18, 2019].  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Hottinger AF, Sanson M, Moyal E, et al. P08.63 Dose optimization of MK-8628 (OTX015), a small molecule inhibitor of bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) proteins, in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol 2016;18 Suppl 4:56.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
A Dose-finding Study of MK-8628 in Participants with Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme (MK-8628-002) – Full Text View. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02296476. [Accessed Aug 18, 2019].  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
A Dose Exploration Study with MK-8628 in Participants with Selected Advanced Solid Tumors (MK-8628-006) – Full Text View. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02698176. [Accessed Aug 18, 2019].  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Clinical Study Report P006-MK-8628. Available from: https://www.spiapps.com/Upload/469_8628-P006-CSR Synopsis_Final Redaction.pdf. [Accessed July 20, 2019].  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Merck Clinical Trials. Available from: https://www.merck.com/clinical-trials/study.html?id=8628-006&kw=cancer. [Accessed Aug 18, 2019].  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Hilton J, Cristea MC, Voskoboynik M, et al. 4110 Initial results from a Phase I/IIA trial evaluating BMS-986158, an inhibitor of the bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) proteins, in patients (pts) with advanced cancer. Ann Oncol 2018;29 Suppl 8:mdy279.399.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Dose Escalation and Expansion Study of GSK525762 in Combination with Fulvestrant in Subjects with Hormone Receptor-positive (HR)/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Negative (HER2-) Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer – Full Text View. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02964507. [Accessed Aug 18, 2019].  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Dose Escalation and Dose Expansion Study of GSK525762 in Combination with Androgen Deprivation Therapy and other Agents in Subjects with Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer – Full Text View. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03150056. [Accessed Aug 18, 2019].  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Open-Label Safety and Tolerability Study of INCB057643 in Subjects with Advanced Malignancies – NCT02711137. National Cancer Institute. Available from: https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/clinical-trials/search/v?id=NCI-2016-01069. [Accessed Aug 18, 2019].  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Azacitidine Combined with Pembrolizumab and Epacadostat in Subjects with Advanced Solid Tumors (ECHO-206) – NCT02959437. National Cancer Institute. Available from: https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/clinical-trials/search/v?id=NCI-2017-00194. [Accessed Aug 18, 2019].  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
A Two Part Study of RO6870810. Dose-Escalation Study in Participants with Advanced Solid Tumors and Expansion Study in Participants with Selected Malignancies – NCT01987362. National Cancer Institute. Available from: https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/clinical-trials/search/v?id=NCT01987362&r=1. [Accessed Aug 18, 2019].  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Clinical Activity of RO6870810 and Atezolizumab (PD-L1 Antibody) in Participants with Advanced Ovarian Cancer or Triple Negative Breast Cancer – NCT03292172. National Cancer Institute. Available from: https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/clinical-trials/search/v?id=NCI-2017-02438. [Accessed Aug 18, 2019].  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Clinical Activity of RO6870810 and Atezolizumab (PD-L1 Antibody) in Participants with Advanced Ovarian Cancer or Triple Negative Breast Cancer – Full Text View. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03292172. [Accessed Aug 18, 2019].  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
AZD5153 in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Solid Tumors, Including Lymphomas – Full Text View. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03205176. [Accessed Aug 18, 2019].  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Wang JS, Vita SD, Karlix JL, et al. First-in-human study of AZD5153, a small molecule inhibitor of bromodomain protein 4 (BRD4), in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (RR) malignant solid tumor and lymphoma: Preliminary data. J Clin Oncol 2019;15 Suppl 37:3085.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Rhyasen GW, Hattersley MM, Yao Y, et al. AZD5153: A novel bivalent bet bromodomain inhibitor highly active against hematologic malignancies. Mol Cancer Ther 2016;15:2563-74.  Back to cited text no. 35
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   Abstract
  Introduction
   Bromodomain and ...
   Birabresib (Prev...
  Discussion
   References
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed429    
    Printed22    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded56    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal